NEW!  Version 3 of iPi Motion Capture is available. iPi Motion Capture 3 delivers new features for improved workflow including support of Kinect 2, improved arms tracking, simplified calibration and others. Read more >>

This documentation corresponds to version 2 of iPi Motion Capture. The latest documentation for version 3 can be found at https://docs.ipisoft.com/

Dual Depth Sensors vs Sony PS Eye Comparison

From iPiSoft Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 9: Line 9:
 
||  
 
||  
 
* Capture area is limited with 7 x 7 feet ( = 2 x 2 meters)
 
* Capture area is limited with 7 x 7 feet ( = 2 x 2 meters)
−
* Framerate is only 30 fps (cannot track fast motions)
+
* Framerate is only 30 fps (more tracking errors on fast motions)
 
* More problems with occlusion (especially for complex motions including rotations)
 
* More problems with occlusion (especially for complex motions including rotations)
 
* Cannot be used outdoors
 
* Cannot be used outdoors
Line 25: Line 25:
 
* Higher requirements for HDD speed
 
* Higher requirements for HDD speed
 
|}
 
|}
 +
 +
 +
== General Recommendations ==
 +
* Dual Depth Sensor configuration is very practical, it is easier to use and able to track many kinds of motions. We can recommend it if:
 +
** Your room is not very big (less than 20 x 20 feet =  6 x 6 meters)
 +
** You do not need to track fast complex motions like energetic dancing, acrobatics, etc.
 +
** You do not need to track 2 actors
 +
 +
 +
* Sony PS Eye cameras is the most powerful option, but you have to invest more time in learning. We can recommend it if:
 +
** 7 x 7 feet ( = 2 x 2 meters) capture area is not enough for your motions, and your room bigger than 20 x 20 feet ( =  6 x 6 meters)
 +
** You plan to track fast complex motions like energetic dancing, acrobatics, etc.
 +
** You paln to track 2 actors

Revision as of 21:58, 24 April 2013

There is no straightforward answer to the questions which is better - Dual Depth Sensor or Sony PS Eye Cameras configuration. The accuracy of tracking is almost the same. Pros and cons summary:

Cameras Pros Cons
Dual Depth Sensors
  • Easier to set-up and calibrate
  • Require less space due to wider angle of view, minimum required space is 9 x 5 feet ( = 2.7 x 1.5 meters)
  • No requirments to clothes color
  • Capture area is limited with 7 x 7 feet ( = 2 x 2 meters)
  • Framerate is only 30 fps (more tracking errors on fast motions)
  • More problems with occlusion (especially for complex motions including rotations)
  • Cannot be used outdoors
Sony PS Eye (3 to 6 cameras)
  • More accurate tracking for head and feet
  • MUCH bigger capture area, up to 20 by 20 feet ( = 7 by 7 meters)
  • 60 fps framerate allow to track very fast motions
  • Less problems with occlusion (especially for 6 cameras)
  • Allow outdoor capture (not in sunny weather though)
  • Set-up and calibration takes more time
  • More issues with USB controllers (you need 3 USB controllers for 6 cameras)
  • You need more space, minimum required space is 13 x 13 feet ( = 4 x 4 meters)
  • Higher requirements for HDD speed


General Recommendations

  • Dual Depth Sensor configuration is very practical, it is easier to use and able to track many kinds of motions. We can recommend it if:
    • Your room is not very big (less than 20 x 20 feet = 6 x 6 meters)
    • You do not need to track fast complex motions like energetic dancing, acrobatics, etc.
    • You do not need to track 2 actors


  • Sony PS Eye cameras is the most powerful option, but you have to invest more time in learning. We can recommend it if:
    • 7 x 7 feet ( = 2 x 2 meters) capture area is not enough for your motions, and your room bigger than 20 x 20 feet ( = 6 x 6 meters)
    • You plan to track fast complex motions like energetic dancing, acrobatics, etc.
    • You paln to track 2 actors
Retrieved from "https://wiki.ipisoft.com/index.php?title=Dual_Depth_Sensors_vs_Sony_PS_Eye_Comparison&oldid=1746"
Personal tools